By Howard Schneider and Ann Saphir
WASHINGTON, Jan 11 (Reuters) – The Trump administration has threatened to indict Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell over Congressional testimony he gave last summer about a Fed building project, an action Powell called a “pretext” to gain more influence over the central bank and monetary policy.
The development in the long-simmering effort by President Donald Trump for greater control over the Fed had immediate fallout, with Republican Senator Thom Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee that vets Presidential nominees for the Fed, saying in a statement on X that the threatened indictment puts the Department of Justice’s “independence and credibility” in question. Tillis said he would oppose any Trump nominees to the Fed, including the president’s coming choice of a new chair, “until this legal matter is fully resolved.”
Powell revealed the subpoenas and threats in a Sunday night statement.
“On Friday, the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment related to my testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June,” Powell said. “I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No one—certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve—is above the law.”
“But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration’s threats and ongoing pressure” for lower interest rates and more broadly for greater say over the Fed, he said.
“This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress’s oversight role…Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.”
Trump told NBC News Sunday that he had no knowledge of the Justice Department’s actions. “I don’t know anything about it, but he’s certainly not very good at the Fed, and he’s not very good at building buildings,” Trump said.
A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on the case but added: “The Attorney General has instructed her US Attorneys to prioritize investigating any abuse of tax payer dollars.”
POWELL INQUIRY A ‘LOW POINT’ IN TRUMP PRESIDENCY
Trump has demanded the Fed cut rates sharply since resuming office in January, blaming its policy for holding back the economy and musing about firing Powell despite the legal protections ostensibly covering the Fed chair from removal. He is also trying to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook in a case that is now pending before the Supreme Court.
The independence of central banks, at least in setting interest rates in order to control inflation, is considered a central tenet of robust economic policy, insulating monetary policymakers from short-term political considerations and allowing them to focus on longer-term efforts to keep prices relatively stable.
The inquiry into Powell “is a low point in Trump’s presidency and a low point in the history of central banking in America,” said Peter Conti-Brown, a Fed historian at the University of Pennsylvania. “Congress did not design the Fed to reflect the president’s daily fluctuations, and because the Fed has rebuffed President Trump’s efforts to take the Fed down he is launching the full weight of American criminal law against its Chair.”
Financial markets reflected little change in near-term expectations for Fed policy even after Powell’s term as chair ends in May, with rate-futures continuing to price in two rate cuts for the year.
The dollar fell and U.S. equity futures slid on the latest news, but the moves were relatively modest so far. [MKTS/GLOB]
LATEST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION MOVES MARK TURNING POINT?
The subpoenas and statement by Powell mark a stark shift in the now longstanding battle between Trump and Powell. Trump elevated Powell to the chair’s job during his first term, but quickly soured on him and made his opinions clear in a series of rebukes and threats.
Powell, for his part, had largely eschewed comment on the president’s actions or statements, instead acknowledging that chief executives often express opinions about a variety of issues, and pledging, as he did in the Sunday statement, to “continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do.”
However, the Trump administration’s latest moves, coming within months of the end of Powell’s term as chair in May, appear to have marked a turning point, with Powell directly accusing the administration of using the legal system to try to achieve its goal of getting the Fed to lower interest rates further and faster than the central bank’s body of 19 policymakers feels is appropriate.
While Powell’s term as chair ends in May, he has the right to continue on the Fed board until January 31, 2028, depriving the president of an additional Fed appointment – what would be Trump’s fourth on the seven-member board – until near the end of his term.
The White House began early last year criticizing the Fed’s $2.5 billion renovation of two of its buildings in Washington, describing it as overly costly and ostentatious.
Some analysts at the time did call it a pretext for the Trump administration’s pressure campaign for lower interest rates, but Powell did not. The Fed chair instead posted detailed explanations of the work on the central bank’s website and sent letters to members of the Trump administration providing background.
In June, when Powell gave his usual twice-yearly testimony on monetary policy to Congress, he was asked repeatedly about the work, which he explained as being necessary updates to outdated infrastructure. In July Trump made a rare presidential visit to the site, and Powell gave him a tour.
(Reporting by Howard Schneider and Ann Saphier; Additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt and Michael Derby; Editing by Neil Fullick and Shri Navaratnam)
Comments